Christian Classics
‹ Summa Theologica Article. 4 - Whether perseverance needs the help of grace? [*Cf. FS, Q[109], A[10]]

Thomas Aquinas · 2107 of 3516

Article. 4 - Whether perseverance needs the help of grace? [*Cf. FS, Q[109], A[10]]

Objection 1: It seems that does not need the help of . For is a virtue, as stated above (A[1]). Now according to Tully (De Invent. Rhet. ii) virtue acts after the manner of nature. Therefore the sole inclination of virtue suffices for . Therefore this does not need the help of .

Objection 2: Further, the gift of Christ's is greater than the harm brought upon us by Adam, as appears from Rom. 5:15, seqq. Now "before sin man was so framed that he could by means of what he had received," as Augustine says (De Correp. et Grat. xi). Much more therefore can man, after being repaired by the of Christ, without the help of a further .

Objection 3: Further, sinful deeds are sometimes more difficult than deeds of virtue: hence it is said in the person of the wicked (Wis. 5:7): "We . . . have walked through hard ways." Now some in sinful deeds without the help of another. Therefore man can also in deeds of virtue without the help of .

On the contrary, Augustine says (De Persev. i): "We hold that is a gift of God, whereby we unto the end, in Christ."

I answer that, As stated above (A[1], ad 2; A[2], ad 3), has a twofold signification. First, it denotes the habit of , considered as a virtue. In this way it needs the gift of habitual , even as the other infused virtues. Secondly, it may be taken to denote the act of enduring until death: and in this sense it needs not only habitual , but also the gratuitous help of God sustaining man in good until the end of life, as stated above (FS, Q[109], A[10]), when we were treating of . Because, since the free-will is changeable by its very nature, which changeableness is not taken away from it by the habitual bestowed in the present life, it is not in the power of the free-will, albeit repaired by , to unchangeably in good, though it is in its power to choose this: for it is often in our power to choose yet not to accomplish.

Reply to Objection 1: The virtue of , so far as it is concerned, inclines one to : yet since it is a habit, and a habit is a thing one uses at will, it does not follow that a person who has the habit of virtue uses it unchangeably until death.

Reply to Objection 2: As Augustine says (De Correp. et Grat. xi), "it was given to the first man, not to , but to be able to of his free-will: because then no corruption was in human nature to make difficult. Now, however, by the of Christ, the receive not only the possibility of , but itself. the first man whom no man threatened, of his own free-will rebelling against a threatening God, forfeited so great a happiness and so great a facility of avoiding sin: whereas these, although the world rage against their constancy, have in faith."

Reply to Objection 3: Man is able by himself to fall into sin, but he cannot by himself arise from sin without the help of . Hence by falling into sin, so far as he is concerned man makes himself to be in sin, unless he be delivered by God's . On the other hand, by doing good he does not make himself to be in good, because he is able, by himself, to sin: he needs the help of for that end.